home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM!taumet!clamage
- From: rsalz@osf.org (Rich Salz)
- Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads,comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Is STL MT-Safe?
- Date: 20 Apr 1996 15:45:54 GMT
- Organization: Open Software Foundation
- Approved: clamage@eng.sun.com (comp.std.c++)
- Message-ID: <4l9hm2$o6l@paperboy.osf.org>
- References: <4kmjvj$89t@usc.edu> <4kspmb$9tb@ubszh.fh.zh.ubs.com> <3173E95E.5AC@ix.netcom.com> <4l12rf$q11@galaxy.ucr.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: taumet.eng.sun.com
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sulphur.osf.org
- Content-Length: 276
- Originator: clamage@taumet
-
- In <4l12rf$q11@galaxy.ucr.edu> thp@cs.ucr.edu (Tom Payne) writes:
- >The standards process is the appropriate forum for such vendor
- >agreement.
-
- Standards bodies seem to work best when they have a good base document
- to work from that is pragmatic, practical, and deployed.
- /r$
-
-
- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles: try just posting with ]
- [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
- [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]
- [ Policy: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html ]
- [ Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu ]
-